You’ve probably walked past a flickering light in a hallway or noticed a security camera that looks like it hasn’t worked in years. Most of the time, we don’t think twice about these things. But these seemingly small oversights are exactly the kinds of failures that create opportunities for criminals. When a property owner ignores these basic safety measures and someone gets hurt, it’s not just a tragic accident—it’s a breach of their legal duty. If you were injured because of these conditions, you may have grounds for a negligent security lawsuit. This article will break down the common security lapses that lead to injury and explain what it takes to prove a property owner was negligent.
Key Takeaways
- Property Owners Must Provide Reasonable Security: A property owner can be held liable if you are injured by a crime on their premises because they failed to address foreseeable risks with adequate safety measures, like proper lighting or working locks.
- A Strong Case Is Built on Solid Proof: To prove negligence, you need specific evidence that connects the owner’s failure to your injury, including security footage, police reports, maintenance logs, and witness statements.
- You Can Recover for All Your Losses: Compensation in a negligent security case goes beyond immediate medical bills to cover future care, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, and the physical and emotional pain caused by the incident.
What Is a Negligent Security Case?
When you visit a business, apartment complex, or parking garage, you have a right to expect a reasonable level of safety. Property owners have a legal responsibility to protect visitors from foreseeable criminal acts on their premises. A negligent security case arises when a property owner fails to provide adequate safety measures, and as a result, someone is injured by a crime like an assault, robbery, or attack. If a property owner’s failure to secure their property contributed to the harm you suffered, they could be held legally responsible for your injuries and losses.
Key Elements of a Valid Claim
To build a successful negligent security claim, we typically need to prove four key things. First, we establish that the property owner owed you a “duty of care,” which is a legal obligation to provide a reasonably safe environment. Second, we show they breached that duty by failing to implement proper security. Third, we must draw a direct line connecting their failure to your injuries. Finally, we demonstrate that you suffered actual damages, such as medical bills, lost wages, and emotional distress. A critical piece of this is proving the crime was “foreseeable”—meaning the owner knew or should have known that a similar crime was likely to happen on their property.
Common Examples of Incidents
Negligent security can happen almost anywhere, from hotels and shopping malls to gas stations and apartment buildings. The security failures themselves can take many forms. Common examples of inadequate security include poor lighting in hallways and parking lots, broken locks on doors and windows, or non-functioning security cameras. It can also involve a lack of security personnel, poorly trained guards, or security gates that are broken or left wide open. If you were attacked or robbed because a property owner didn’t fix a broken gate or hire a guard for a high-crime area, you may have a valid claim.
Negligent Security vs. Other Premises Liability Claims
Negligent security is a specific type of premises liability claim. While many premises liability cases involve accidents from unsafe physical conditions—like a wet floor causing a slip and fall—negligent security cases are different. They specifically involve an injury caused by the criminal act of a third person. For example, tripping over a cracked sidewalk is a standard premises liability case. But if you are assaulted in a dimly lit parking garage because the owners failed to install proper lighting despite recent muggings in the area, that becomes a negligent security case. The key difference is that your injury resulted from a crime that adequate security could have prevented.
Who Can Be Held Responsible for a Security Failure?
When you’re injured because of a security lapse, figuring out who is at fault can feel complicated. The good news is that the responsibility doesn’t always fall on a single person or entity. In many cases, multiple parties could have prevented the harm you suffered and can be held accountable for their failure to act. This is a key part of building a strong premises liability claim.
Identifying the responsible parties is the first step toward getting the justice you deserve. Depending on the specifics of your situation, liability could lie with the person who owns the property, the company managing it, a security firm they hired, or even a third-party vendor. An experienced attorney can help investigate the incident and determine who failed to uphold their duty to keep you safe from foreseeable harm.
Property Owners and Managers
Property owners and the companies that manage their properties have a legal duty to keep visitors reasonably safe. This isn’t just about fixing a broken step; it includes taking sensible security measures to protect people from crimes that could be anticipated. If a property is in a high-crime area or has a history of similar incidents, the owner is expected to implement appropriate safeguards like proper lighting, secure locks, or security patrols. When they fail to take these basic steps and someone gets hurt, they can be held responsible for that inadequate security.
Security Companies
Sometimes, a property owner hires an outside company to handle security. If that security company fails to do its job correctly, it can also be held liable. For example, if guards were hired to patrol a parking garage but weren’t at their posts when an assault occurred, the security company could be at fault. Their responsibility is based on the contract they signed with the property owner. If they promised to provide certain services and didn’t follow through, their negligence contributed to the incident, making them a party to the lawsuit.
Business Operators
Even if a business doesn’t own the building it operates in, it still has a responsibility to protect its customers. A retail store in a mall, a restaurant, or a nightclub must ensure its specific location is secure. This is especially true if crimes have happened on their premises or nearby in the past. For instance, if a bar has had several fights break out, the operator should hire bouncers or take other measures to prevent future violence. Failing to do so means they are neglecting the safety of their patrons and can be held accountable if someone is injured as a result.
Third-Party Contractors
Property owners can’t escape liability simply by hiring someone else to do the work. If an owner hires a third-party contractor to install security cameras or repair a broken gate, and that contractor does a poor job, the owner may still be on the hook. The owner is ultimately responsible for ensuring their property is safe. If they hire an incompetent contractor or fail to make sure the work was done correctly, they share in the responsibility when that failure leads to an injury. This ensures that property owners remain diligent about who they trust to maintain a secure environment.
How to Build a Strong Negligent Security Case
Building a successful negligent security claim requires more than just showing you were hurt on someone else’s property. You need to construct a solid argument that connects your injuries directly to the property owner’s failure to provide a safe environment. It’s about telling a clear story, backed by evidence, that demonstrates how their carelessness created the conditions for you to be harmed. When you’re recovering from an injury, the legal process can feel overwhelming, but breaking it down into clear steps can make it much more manageable.
A strong case is built piece by piece, like a puzzle. Each element must fit together to show a complete picture of negligence. This isn’t about placing blame randomly; it’s about methodically proving that the property owner knew, or should have known, about a potential danger and did nothing to address it. This could be anything from ignoring a history of crime in the area to failing to fix a broken security gate. The goal is to demonstrate that your injury was not just a tragic accident but a preventable event.
This section will walk you through the essential components of a strong negligent security case. We’ll cover how to prove the owner owed you a duty of care, how to identify specific security failures, and why showing the harm was “foreseeable” is so important. We’ll also touch on the types of evidence you’ll need and how experts can support your claim. Understanding these steps is the first move toward holding the responsible party accountable and securing the compensation you need to recover.
Proving a “Duty of Care” Was Owed
The foundation of any negligent security case is the “duty of care.” In simple terms, property owners have a legal responsibility to take reasonable steps to keep visitors, customers, and tenants safe from preventable harm. This isn’t just a nice idea; it’s a legal obligation that comes with owning or managing a property. This duty applies whether you’re at a shopping mall, an apartment complex, a concert venue, or a parking garage. The owner must actively identify potential dangers and implement basic security to address them. This is a core principle of all premises liability claims.
Showing How Security Measures Failed
Once you establish the property owner had a duty to keep you safe, the next step is to show how they failed to meet that obligation. This failure, or “breach of duty,” is the core of your negligence claim. It can manifest in many ways, from the obvious to the subtle. Common examples of inadequate security include having no security cameras or cameras that don’t work, hiring untrained security guards, having broken locks on doors and gates, or failing to provide enough lighting in hallways and parking lots. These aren’t minor oversights; they are significant lapses that create opportunities for criminal activity and put people at risk.
Explaining Why the Harm Was “Foreseeable”
This can be one of the most challenging parts of a case, but it’s essential. To hold a property owner liable, you must show that the crime or incident was “foreseeable.” This doesn’t mean the owner had to know the exact attack would happen at a specific time. Instead, it means they should have reasonably anticipated that a similar type of crime could occur based on the circumstances. For example, if a particular apartment building has had a string of break-ins, it is foreseeable that a violent assault could also happen. Evidence of prior crimes in the area or on the property itself helps establish foreseeability and proves the owner should have done more.
Gathering the Right Documentation
Strong evidence is the backbone of your case, and it’s crucial to act quickly to preserve it. Important details can disappear, and witnesses’ memories can fade over time. Start by collecting any photos or videos you have of the scene, paying special attention to things like poor lighting, broken gates, or overgrown landscaping that could hide a perpetrator. Keep detailed records of all your medical treatments and bills. Be sure to get a copy of the official police report. This documentation creates a factual record of what happened and supports your personal injury claim from the very beginning.
Using Expert Testimony to Strengthen Your Claim
Sometimes, your story and documentation need a professional voice to tie everything together. This is where expert witnesses come in. A security consultant can assess the property and testify about the specific security failures that led to your injury. They can explain what “reasonable” security measures would have been under the circumstances and how the owner fell short. This professional opinion adds significant weight and credibility to your claim, making it clear to a judge or jury that your injuries were a direct result of the owner’s negligence, not just a random act of violence.
What Evidence Do You Need for Your Case?
Building a strong negligent security case is all about gathering the right proof. Think of it like assembling a puzzle—each piece of evidence helps to create a clear picture of what happened and why the property owner is responsible. While the thought of collecting all this information can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re recovering from an injury, this is where an experienced attorney can make all the difference. We know exactly what to look for and how to secure it before it disappears. The more concrete evidence you have, the stronger your position will be, whether you’re negotiating a settlement or presenting your case in court.
Security Footage and Photos
Visual evidence is one of the most powerful tools in a negligent security lawsuit. Security camera footage can directly show the incident as it happened, as well as the conditions that allowed it to occur, such as poor lighting or a non-functioning security gate. Photos or videos you take with your phone immediately after the incident are also incredibly valuable. Capturing images of broken locks, unlit stairwells, or overgrown landscaping that could hide an assailant can help prove the property owner failed in their duty to keep you safe. It’s critical to act fast, as many businesses delete security footage on a regular schedule. An attorney can send a formal request to preserve this crucial evidence.
Incident and Police Reports
Official documentation provides a credible, third-party account of what happened. If you were the victim of a crime, filing a police report is one of the most important first steps. This report creates an official record of the date, time, location, and other details of the incident. Similarly, if you reported the event to the property manager or business owner, they likely created an internal incident report. These documents are key to establishing a timeline and substantiating your claim. They serve as foundational evidence that an injury or crime occurred on the property, which is a necessary part of any premises liability case.
Witness Statements
What other people saw can significantly strengthen your case. Witnesses can provide firsthand accounts of the incident itself or the unsafe conditions on the property leading up to it. For example, a neighbor might be able to confirm that a security gate has been broken for months, or another customer might have seen the attack happen. Because memories can fade over time, it’s important to identify any witnesses and gather their contact information as soon as possible. Your legal team can then follow up to get formal statements that corroborate your version of events and highlight the property owner’s negligence.
Previous Security Assessments
To prove negligence, you often need to show that the harm you suffered was “foreseeable.” This means the property owner knew, or should have known, that a dangerous situation could occur. Evidence of past crimes at the location or in the immediate vicinity is crucial for this. We can obtain police call logs for the address, records of prior similar incidents, and any security assessments the owner may have conducted. If a security consultant previously warned the owner about inadequate security and they failed to act, that becomes a powerful piece of evidence in your favor.
Property Maintenance Records
A property owner’s duty of care includes properly maintaining their premises. Maintenance logs, work orders, and repair invoices can reveal whether the owner knew about a specific hazard and failed to fix it. For example, records might show repeated requests to repair a broken lock on a main entrance or to replace burnt-out lightbulbs in a dark parking garage. These documents can prove that the owner was aware of the hazardous conditions on their property but chose not to invest in the necessary repairs, directly contributing to the incident that caused your injuries.
Common Security Lapses That Lead to Injury
When you hear about a security failure, you might picture a dramatic scene from a movie. But in reality, the lapses that lead to serious injuries are often much more ordinary. They are the simple, overlooked details that a property owner should have addressed but didn’t. These oversights can turn a seemingly safe place—like an apartment complex, a parking garage, or a shopping center—into a location where someone gets hurt.
A property owner’s duty isn’t just about putting up a “Beware of Dog” sign. It’s about actively identifying and fixing potential dangers to keep visitors, tenants, and customers safe from foreseeable harm. When they fail to take these reasonable steps, they create an environment where assaults, robberies, and other violent crimes can happen. Understanding these common failures is the first step in recognizing when you might have a case for inadequate security. From a burned-out lightbulb to an untrained security guard, these small details can have life-altering consequences.
Inadequate Lighting
Poorly lit areas are an open invitation for criminal activity. When stairwells, parking lots, hallways, and walkways are shrouded in darkness, it’s easier for attackers to hide and surprise their victims. Property owners have a responsibility to ensure their premises are well-lit to deter crime and help people see potential dangers. If you were attacked in a dark area of a property, the owner’s failure to provide adequate lighting could be a key factor in your case. This simple oversight can directly contribute to assaults, robberies, and even slip and fall accidents over unseen hazards.
Broken Locks, Gates, or Cameras
Functioning security hardware is one of the most basic ways a property owner can protect people. A broken lock on a lobby door, a malfunctioning security gate in a garage, or a non-working surveillance camera are all signs of negligence. These failures create easy access for intruders who intend to cause harm. Property owners can’t just install these features; they must also perform regular maintenance to ensure they work correctly. When they fail to repair these essential security elements, they leave residents and visitors vulnerable and may be held responsible for creating unsafe facilities.
Insufficient Staff or Poor Training
Sometimes, security failures are less about faulty equipment and more about the people in charge of safety. A property might not have enough security guards on patrol, especially in a large or high-crime area. Even worse, the staff on-site may lack the proper training to identify threats, de-escalate situations, or respond effectively during an emergency. This is particularly critical in places that require active monitoring, like schools or large public venues. A case of inadequate supervision can be just as dangerous as a broken lock, and property owners can be held liable for failing to hire and train a competent security team.
Lack of Access Control
Controlling who comes and goes is fundamental to keeping a property secure. This can include anything from key card systems in office buildings and apartment complexes to front desk staff who check in visitors. When a property owner fails to secure access points, they essentially leave the door open for anyone to enter, including individuals with criminal intent. If someone was able to get into a “secure” building and harm you because of a propped-open door or a lack of any system to monitor entry, the owner may have breached their duty of care. This failure is a core component of many premises liability claims.
Failure to Address Known Hazards
Perhaps one of the most clear-cut examples of negligence is when a property owner knows about a danger and does nothing to fix it. This could mean ignoring repeated complaints from tenants about suspicious individuals on the property or failing to increase security after a series of break-ins in the area. If a property has a history of criminal activity, the owner is on notice that they need to take reasonable steps to protect people. Ignoring known threats or failing to warn visitors about them is a serious lapse that can directly lead to a preventable personal injury.
What Compensation Can You Recover?
If you were injured because a property owner failed to provide adequate security, you have the right to seek compensation for your losses. In legal terms, this compensation is called “damages,” and it’s designed to cover the full range of harm you’ve experienced—from tangible medical bills to the emotional toll of the incident. The goal is to help you get back on your feet financially so you can focus on your physical and emotional recovery.
A successful personal injury claim accounts for every way the incident has impacted your life. This includes not only the expenses you’re facing right now but also the costs you’ll likely face in the future. An experienced attorney can help you identify all potential damages to ensure you pursue the full and fair compensation you deserve. These damages typically fall into a few key categories, covering everything from medical care and lost income to your personal suffering and property loss.
Medical Bills (Current and Future)
After an injury, medical expenses are often the most immediate and overwhelming concern. Compensation covers all your current medical costs, including emergency room visits, hospital stays, surgeries, doctor’s appointments, and prescription medications. But it doesn’t stop there. Many injuries require long-term care, and a settlement should account for that.
Future medical needs can include physical therapy, rehabilitation, ongoing treatments, counseling, or even modifications to your home. We work with medical experts to understand the full scope of your injuries and project the costs of your future care. This ensures you won’t be left paying out-of-pocket for necessary treatments years down the road. These cases are a core part of premises liability law, which holds property owners responsible for ensuring your safety.
Lost Wages and Earning Capacity
An injury doesn’t just affect your health; it can also impact your ability to work and provide for your family. You can recover compensation for any wages you lost while you were unable to work during your recovery. This includes salary, hourly pay, and any bonuses or commissions you would have earned.
In more serious cases, an injury might permanently affect your ability to do your job or earn the same income as before. This is known as “diminished earning capacity.” For example, if your injury prevents you from returning to a physically demanding job, you can seek damages for the difference in your potential future earnings. We fight to make sure your financial stability is protected, both now and in the future. You can find answers to more questions like this on our FAQ page.
Pain and Suffering
Not all harm can be measured by a receipt or a pay stub. “Pain and suffering” is a legal term for the physical pain and emotional distress you experience because of your injury. This includes the actual physical pain from the injury itself, as well as emotional trauma like anxiety, fear, depression, insomnia, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It also covers the loss of enjoyment of life—the inability to participate in hobbies, activities, or relationships that were important to you before the incident.
While it’s impossible to put a price tag on your suffering, this compensation is a critical part of acknowledging the human cost of the negligence. An experienced attorney knows how to build a strong case that clearly demonstrates the profound impact the incident has had on your life.
Damaged Property
In many negligent security incidents, such as an assault or robbery, victims also lose personal property. You are entitled to compensation for any items that were stolen or damaged during the event. This can include your wallet, phone, laptop, jewelry, or even your vehicle if it was vandalized or stolen from a poorly secured parking lot.
While the value of these items may seem small compared to your medical bills, it’s still a financial loss you shouldn’t have to bear. We’ll help you document these losses to ensure they are included in your claim. Holding property owners accountable for inadequate security means making sure you are compensated for all of your losses, big and small.
Common Defenses in Negligent Security Cases
When you file a negligent security claim, you can expect the property owner and their insurance company to present a strong defense. Their goal is to minimize their financial responsibility or avoid it altogether. Understanding these common arguments is the first step in building a case that can withstand their challenges. It’s important to remember that these are standard tactics, and an experienced attorney will be prepared to counter them with facts, evidence, and a clear legal strategy.
The core of their defense will likely revolve around deflecting blame—either by arguing they did enough, by pointing the finger at you, or by claiming the incident was a complete fluke that no one could have predicted. They have a legal team dedicated to protecting their interests. That’s why you need a team like AZ Law Now dedicated to protecting yours. We anticipate these defenses and build a robust premises liability case from day one, gathering the evidence needed to show why the property owner is truly responsible for the harm you suffered.
Arguing Their Security Was “Reasonable”
One of the most frequent defenses is the claim that the security measures in place were “reasonable” under the circumstances. The property owner will argue they met their basic obligations by having things like standard locks, some lighting, or maybe a single security camera. They will try to portray the incident as an unfortunate event that happened despite their adequate precautions.
However, “reasonable” is not a one-size-fits-all standard. The level of security required depends entirely on the property’s history, location, and nature. A bar in an area with a high crime rate needs more than a boutique in a quiet suburb. Our job is to demonstrate that their security was, in fact, unreasonable for their specific situation and that their failure to provide adequate protection directly led to your injuries.
Claiming You Were Partially at Fault
This defense tactic, known as comparative negligence, attempts to shift some or all of the blame onto you, the victim. The property owner’s legal team might suggest that your own actions contributed to the incident. They could argue that you were in a restricted area, were not paying attention to your surroundings, or acted in a way that invited the danger. Their goal is to reduce the amount of compensation they have to pay by assigning you a percentage of fault.
In Arizona, this doesn’t necessarily prevent you from recovering damages, but it can complicate your case. We will work to counter these claims by presenting a clear picture of the events and proving that the property owner’s negligence was the primary cause of what happened. We are prepared to fight back against any unfair attempts to blame you for your own injuries.
Blaming an Unrelated Third Party
Property owners will often argue that they are not responsible for the criminal actions of another person. They will claim that the attacker is the only one at fault and that the crime was an “intervening cause” completely beyond their control. In essence, they are saying, “Don’t blame us; blame the criminal.”
While the person who directly harmed you is certainly responsible, this argument ignores the property owner’s fundamental duty to keep their premises safe. The entire basis of a negligent security claim is that the owner’s failure to provide proper security created the opportunity for the crime to occur. We connect their negligence—like broken locks or poor lighting—directly to the incident, showing that the harm was a direct result of their security failures.
Pointing to an Unforeseeable Event
Another common defense is the argument that the crime was unforeseeable. The property owner will claim they had no reason to anticipate that such an incident could happen on their premises. They might point to a lack of prior similar crimes on their specific property as evidence that they couldn’t have predicted the danger.
However, foreseeability is about more than just what has happened on that exact parcel of land. We can establish that a risk was foreseeable by investigating crime statistics in the surrounding neighborhood, looking at the nature of the business, and identifying previous security complaints or incidents that should have warned the owner of potential dangers. Our thorough investigation aims to prove that the owner knew, or should have known, about the risks and failed to address the inadequate security on their property.
What to Expect from the Legal Process
Filing a lawsuit can feel intimidating, but understanding the steps involved can make the process much clearer. A negligent security claim follows a structured path, from the initial filing to the final resolution. While every case is unique, most move through a few key phases: investigation, negotiation, and, if necessary, a trial. Our team handles the legal complexities so you can focus on your recovery. We’ll guide you through each stage, ensuring you know what’s happening and what to expect next. The goal is to build a strong case that clearly shows how a property owner’s failure to provide adequate security led to your injuries.
Filing Deadlines You Can’t Miss
One of the most critical parts of any personal injury claim is the statute of limitations. This is a legal deadline that sets a strict time limit for filing a lawsuit. In Arizona, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to file your claim. If you miss this window, you will likely lose your right to seek compensation forever. That’s why it’s so important to speak with an attorney as soon as possible after an incident. Acting quickly allows your legal team to preserve crucial evidence, interview witnesses while their memories are fresh, and ensure all paperwork is filed correctly and on time. Don’t wait until it’s too late to protect your rights.
The Investigation Phase
Once you decide to move forward, your legal team will begin a thorough investigation. To win a negligent security case, we need to prove four key elements: that the property owner had a duty to keep you safe, that they failed in that duty, that their failure directly caused your injury, and that you suffered damages as a result. This phase involves gathering all available evidence, such as security footage, police reports, and maintenance records. We will also identify and interview witnesses, consult with security experts, and document the full extent of your injuries and financial losses. This meticulous preparation is the foundation of a strong premises liability claim.
Negotiating a Settlement
Most personal injury cases are resolved through a settlement before they ever reach a courtroom. After building your case, we will present a demand to the property owner’s insurance company outlining the facts and the compensation you deserve. Insurance companies often try to minimize payouts, especially to individuals without legal representation. Our attorneys are skilled negotiators who will advocate fiercely on your behalf to secure a fair settlement that covers your medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. If the insurance company refuses to offer a reasonable amount, we won’t hesitate to take the next step.
Preparing for Trial
If a fair settlement cannot be reached, we will prepare to take your case to trial. This is a more formal process that involves presenting your case before a judge and jury. Preparation includes finalizing our legal strategy, deposing witnesses under oath, and organizing all evidence for presentation in court. We may also hire expert witnesses, such as security consultants or medical professionals, to provide testimony that strengthens your claim. While going to trial can seem daunting, our experienced litigators will be with you every step of the way, ready to fight for the justice you deserve.
What Happens After the Verdict?
If your case goes to trial and the verdict is in your favor, the court will award you damages. This is the compensation you can recover for the harm you suffered. A successful negligent security lawsuit can provide financial relief for a wide range of losses, including all current and future medical expenses related to the injury, lost wages from being unable to work, and compensation for physical pain and emotional distress. The goal is to ensure you have the financial resources needed to recover and move forward after a traumatic event caused by someone else’s negligence.
How Security Experts Can Help Your Case
Winning a negligent security case often comes down to proving that a property owner failed to meet a reasonable standard of care. But what is “reasonable”? That’s where security experts come in. These professionals provide objective, credible analysis that can be the deciding factor in your claim. They translate complex security concepts into clear, understandable terms for judges and juries.
An experienced personal injury attorney knows how to leverage expert testimony to build a compelling case. By examining the property, reviewing incident reports, and comparing the situation to industry standards, these specialists can pinpoint exactly where security failed and how that failure led to your injuries. Their findings provide the factual backbone needed to hold negligent property owners accountable. From consultants who review security protocols to forensic analysts who reconstruct the crime scene, each expert plays a unique role in strengthening your claim.
Security Consultants
Think of security consultants as professional critics for safety measures. Their job is to evaluate the security that was in place at the time of your injury and determine if it was adequate. They can provide valuable insights by assessing whether the property owner took reasonable steps to protect visitors. For example, they might analyze the placement and functionality of security cameras, the effectiveness of locks and gates, or the training and patrol routes of security guards. A consultant can identify specific deficiencies and explain how those shortcomings created an unsafe environment, directly linking the property owner’s negligence to the harm you suffered.
Risk Assessment Specialists
A key part of any negligent security claim is proving the harm was “foreseeable.” This is where risk assessment specialists are invaluable. These experts analyze the property and its surrounding area to determine if the owner should have anticipated the possibility of criminal activity. They might review local crime statistics, police reports of prior incidents on the property, and the nature of the business itself. Their analysis helps establish that the property owner had a duty to implement stronger security measures because the risk of a crime like assault or robbery was predictable. Their testimony is crucial for showing the owner knew, or should have known, about the danger.
Forensic Analysts
While other experts focus on protocols and risk, forensic analysts get into the hard evidence of the incident itself. They can examine the crime scene to find and interpret physical proof that supports your claim of inadequate security. A forensic analyst might enhance grainy security footage to identify a perpetrator, analyze a broken lock to determine how entry was gained, or reconstruct the sequence of events based on evidence left behind. Their detailed reports provide a scientific foundation for your case, showing precisely how a specific security failure contributed to the incident and your injuries.
Expert Witnesses
While the specialists above all provide expert analysis, an “expert witness” is the person who presents these findings in a formal legal setting, like a deposition or a trial. These witnesses are masters at explaining industry standards for security and the level of care property owners are expected to provide. Their testimony helps educate the judge and jury on what should have been done to keep you safe. By clearly and confidently explaining where the defendant fell short, a credible expert witness can significantly influence the outcome of your case and help ensure you receive the justice you deserve.
Related Articles
- Inadequate Security Claims | Arizona Premises Liability Lawyer
- Inadequate Supervision Injury? AZ Negligence Attorneys Can Help
- Slip and Fall Injury Guide: West Phoenix Claims – AZ Law Now Injury Attorneys
- Negligent Hiring or Training – AZ Law Now Injury Attorneys
Frequently Asked Questions
How can a property owner be responsible for a crime someone else committed? This is a question we hear a lot, and it gets to the heart of these cases. The claim isn’t that the property owner is responsible for the criminal’s actions, but that they are responsible for creating an environment where that crime was more likely to happen. Think of it this way: a broken security gate or a dark, unlit parking garage doesn’t cause a crime, but it creates a perfect opportunity for one. The owner’s legal duty is to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm, and when they fail, they can be held accountable for the consequences.
What if I don’t have much evidence like photos or videos from the scene? Please don’t worry if you weren’t able to gather evidence yourself. After a traumatic event, your first priority is your safety and well-being, not playing detective. A major part of our job is to conduct a thorough investigation on your behalf. We know how to formally request and preserve crucial evidence like security camera footage, obtain police reports and 911 call logs, track down maintenance records, and interview witnesses who can speak to the property’s conditions. You don’t have to build this case alone.
Do I have a case if this happened in a supposedly “safe” area? Yes, you absolutely can. A property owner’s responsibility isn’t determined by the zip code. The key legal concept is “foreseeability,” which can be established in many ways beyond general neighborhood crime statistics. For example, if there were previous break-in attempts at that specific apartment building or if tenants had filed complaints about non-working locks, the owner was on notice of a problem. The nature of the business itself can also create foreseeable risks. A “safe” neighborhood doesn’t give a property owner a pass to ignore their direct security duties.
What are the first steps I should take after being injured? First and foremost, prioritize your health. Get to a safe place and seek medical attention right away, even if you think your injuries are minor. Next, report the incident to the police to ensure an official record is created. You should also notify the property owner or manager about what happened. Finally, it is wise to speak with an attorney before you give any recorded statements to an insurance company. This helps protect your rights from the very beginning.
How much will it cost to pursue a negligent security claim? We understand that the last thing you need after an injury is another financial burden. That’s why our firm, like most personal injury firms, handles these cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no upfront costs or out-of-pocket fees for us to start working on your case. Our payment is a percentage of the final settlement or award we secure for you. Simply put, if we don’t win your case, you don’t owe us any attorney fees.