A structured settlement is an arrangement where compensation is paid out over time rather than in a lump sum. This can provide long-term financial security and tax benefits. In Arizona, structured settlements are often used in cases involving severe injuries or wrongful death.

In cases with multiple defendants, Arizona follows the rule of joint and several liability. This means that each defendant can be held liable for the full amount of damages, regardless of their individual percentage of fault. The defendants may then seek contribution from each other based on their respective levels of responsibility.

Pre-existing conditions don't prevent you from filing a personal injury claim in Arizona. However, you can only recover damages for the extent to which the accident worsened your condition. This is known as the "eggshell plaintiff" rule, which states that defendants must take plaintiffs as they find them, even if they are unusually susceptible to injury.

In slip and fall cases, Arizona property owners have a duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition. To win a slip and fall case, you must prove that the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to address it. The specific duty owed depends on your status as an invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Accident reconstruction experts play a crucial role in complex car accident cases. They use physical evidence, mathematical models, and computer simulations to determine how an accident occurred. Their testimony can help establish fault and contradict conflicting eyewitness accounts, providing valuable evidence in personal injury lawsuits.

For minors, Arizona's statute of limitations is tolled (paused) until they turn 18. This means that a minor injured in an accident generally has until their 20th birthday to file a personal injury lawsuit. However, certain types of claims, such as those against public entities, may have shorter deadlines even for minors.

Social media can significantly impact personal injury cases. Insurance companies and defense attorneys often scrutinize plaintiffs' social media accounts for evidence that contradicts their injury claims. It's advisable to limit social media use during a personal injury case and avoid posting anything that could be misconstrued or used against you.

The attractive nuisance doctrine in Arizona holds property owners liable for injuries to children caused by hazardous objects or conditions on the property that are likely to attract children. This doctrine applies even if the child was trespassing. Common examples include unfenced swimming pools, abandoned appliances, or construction sites.

As autonomous vehicle technology evolves, so does the law. In Arizona, liability for accidents involving autonomous vehicles may fall on the vehicle manufacturer, software developer, or the human operator, depending on the level of autonomy and the specific circumstances of the accident. These cases often involve complex technical and legal issues.

Arbitration agreements, often found in employment contracts or consumer agreements, can limit your ability to file a lawsuit in court. Instead, disputes are resolved through arbitration. In Arizona, these agreements are generally enforceable, but there are exceptions. It's important to have an attorney review any arbitration agreement that might affect your personal injury claim.

Injuries from defective playground equipment may involve claims against equipment manufacturers, installers, or property owners responsible for maintenance. These cases often involve product liability law and premises liability law. Factors considered include equipment design, installation, maintenance, and supervision.

Accident scene investigators play a crucial role in preserving and analyzing evidence from the accident site. They document the scene, take photographs, measure skid marks, and collect other physical evidence. Their findings can be vital in reconstructing the accident and establishing liability, especially in complex cases like multi-vehicle collisions.

Injuries from e-cigarettes or vaping products may involve product liability claims against manufacturers, distributors, or retailers. These cases can be complex due to the evolving nature of the products and regulations. Potential claims may involve design defects, manufacturing defects, or failure to warn of risks.

Pre-injury waivers are often used in recreational activities to limit liability. In Arizona, these waivers are generally enforceable if they are clear and unambiguous. However, they cannot waive liability for gross negligence or intentional misconduct. The enforceability of a waiver can depend on factors like the nature of the activity and the clarity of the waiver language.

Rideshare accidents (involving companies like Uber or Lyft) can be complex due to the multiple insurance policies involved. Liability may depend on whether the driver was actively transporting a passenger, en route to pick up a passenger, or simply logged into the app. Arizona law requires rideshare companies to maintain specific insurance coverage for their drivers.

Biomechanical experts analyze how forces applied to the human body during an accident can cause specific injuries. They use their knowledge of physics and human anatomy to determine if the claimed injuries are consistent with the accident mechanics. Their testimony can be crucial in contested liability or injury causation cases.

Cases involving injuries from falling trees or branches often involve premises liability law. The property owner's liability depends on factors such as their knowledge of the hazardous condition, the tree's location, and the steps taken to inspect and maintain the trees. Different standards may apply depending on whether the property is public or private.

While unsigned consent forms can be a factor in medical malpractice cases, they don't automatically prove malpractice. In Arizona, the key issue is whether the patient gave informed consent, which can be obtained verbally. However, unsigned forms can support a claim that proper informed consent was not obtained, potentially strengthening a malpractice case.

Injuries from cosmetic procedures like laser hair removal may involve claims of medical malpractice or ordinary negligence, depending on who performed the procedure. In Arizona, non-medical professionals can perform certain cosmetic procedures, but they must adhere to specific standards of care. These cases often involve issues of proper training, informed consent, and adherence to safety protocols.

Forensic accountants play a crucial role in calculating economic damages in personal injury cases. They analyze financial records to determine lost wages, loss of future earning capacity, and other economic losses. Their expertise is particularly valuable in cases involving self-employed individuals or those with complex compensation structures.

Electric scooter accidents can involve various liable parties, including the scooter company, the scooter rider, or even the city if poor infrastructure contributed to the accident. Arizona law treats electric scooters similarly to bicycles in many respects. Liability often depends on factors like scooter maintenance, user behavior, and local regulations.

Many nursing home contracts include arbitration agreements. In Arizona, these are generally enforceable if they meet certain criteria, such as being clearly written and voluntarily signed. However, courts may invalidate these agreements if they're deemed unconscionable or if the resident lacked capacity to sign. It's crucial to have an attorney review any such agreement in a nursing home injury case.

Neuropsychologists play a crucial role in traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases. They conduct detailed cognitive and psychological assessments to determine the nature and extent of brain dysfunction. Their evaluations can help establish the link between the accident and the brain injury, as well as the long-term impact on the victim's cognitive abilities, behavior, and quality of life.

Cases involving excessive force by security guards can involve claims of assault, battery, and negligent hiring or supervision against the security company. In Arizona, security guards are permitted to use reasonable force to protect property or persons, but excessive force can lead to liability. These cases often hinge on whether the force used was reasonable given the circumstances.