Arizona School Sexual Abuse Lawyers

For years, a hard answer met Arizona families who tried to hold a public school district responsible after a child was sexually abused by a staff member. The district was a public entity, and immunity often shielded it from the claim. Ava’s Law changed that, but only for a limited time.

Ava’s Law is SB1106, enacted in 2025 as Chapter 60. It amends ARS 12-820.05 so a school district loses its immunity when a student suffers a sexual offense and the district skipped a required background check or failed to report. The exception covers offenses committed on or after the law’s 2025 effective date, and it is written to expire after December 31, 2027. If your family is facing this now, the timing matters.

What Ava’s Law Changed

Arizona gives public entities limited immunity. Under ARS 12-820.05, a district was generally not liable for losses caused by an employee’s crime unless the district knew the employee was likely to commit it. That standard was hard to meet, and it left a gap. A district could do a thin background check, miss a warning sign, and still hide behind immunity when a child got hurt.

Ava’s Law closes that gap for student sexual abuse. The amended statute creates an exception when the victim is a minor or a child with a disability as defined in ARS 15-761, and either of two conditions exists.

• The district was in violation of a statutory duty relating to obtaining information about the background of employees.
• The district or its employee had a statutory duty to report and failed to do so.

The point is accountability. When a district ignores the hiring and reporting rules that protect children, it can no longer treat immunity as a reason to look away.

The Window Is Prospective, and It Closes

This part is easy to get wrong, so read it carefully.

Ava’s Law applies only to acts or omissions involving sexual offenses committed on or after the law’s 2025 effective date. It is not retroactive. It does not reopen claims for abuse that happened in earlier years.

The exception also has a built-in end date. A second version of ARS 12-820.05, written without the exception, takes effect after December 31, 2027. Unless the Legislature extends the law, the immunity shield returns then for conduct after that date. For a family dealing with recent abuse, that window is a reason to move quickly, not later.

When a District Can Be Held Accountable

The strongest claims connect a specific district failure to the harm a child suffered. These theories often work together.

Mandatory reporting is not optional. Under ARS 13-3620, school personnel, including substitute teachers, must report suspected child abuse immediately to the Department of Child Safety or a peace officer. A district that treats reporting as a discretionary call puts both children and itself at risk.

Older Abuse: the ARS 12-514 Deadline

If the abuse happened before the Ava’s Law window, you may still have a claim. ARS 12-514 sets the civil statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse. A survivor generally has until age thirty, defined as within twelve years after turning eighteen.

That statute reaches more than the abuser. It allows claims against a public or private entity that negligently employed the abuser or failed to report the abuse. A temporary revival window for older, time-barred claims expired on December 31, 2020, so the age-thirty deadline is the one most survivors work within today.

The 180-Day Notice of Claim Still Applies

A claim against a public school district runs through Arizona’s government-claim process, even in sexual-abuse cases.

Under ARS 12-821.01, you must file a notice of claim within 180 days of the incident. It has to state specific facts and a specific dollar amount, and it has to reach a person authorized to accept claims for the district. After that, suit must follow within one year under ARS 12-821.

Damages in School Sexual Abuse Cases

Arizona places no cap on compensatory damages against a school district. Recovery can include mental-health treatment and therapy that often continues for years, medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and the loss of educational opportunity.

ARS 12-820.04 does bar punitive damages against public entities and their employees acting within the scope of employment. The law allows full compensation for the actual harm, not punishment on top of it.